check it out US Freestyle Skating Association

This was the single most lethal episode in the course of this sudden war. The survivors will remember it as the day their children died. For the village, it is a fresh pain in a wound cut more than 10 years ago, when an Israeli attack here killed more than 100 civilians. Many of them were children, too.

The Israeli government apologized for that airstrike, as it did for the one here on Sunday. It said that residents had been warned to leave and should have already been gone.

yeah, that makes it alright.

from nytimes.com

Wish her luck at Miss America in California in January!

theSlalom.com

So what’s an Israeli Arab? An Israeli Arab is a Palestinian who lives inside the state of Israel, versus those who live outside of it in occupied Palestine, or those who fled and became refugees or exiles beyond occupied Palestine. More accurately, they should be called Israeli Palestinians. How did they end up inside of Israel? They didn’t. Israel ended up around them; and they make up 20% of Israel’s population. These are the Palestinians, and their descendants, whose existence on that land preceded the state of Israel before 1948. When the Zionists declared the state of Israel on the land the Palestinians had been living on for centuries, 84% fled as a result of coercion and intimidation. These remaining Palestinians were absorbed into this new political entity. These are today’s “Israeli Arabs�.

This term is problematic for a number of reasons. It doesn’t acknowledge their identity as Palestinians and thus overlooks that they existed there before 1948, a simple fact that cannot be denied no matter how lobbyists and PR slicksters finesse it. The Palestinians were present for centuries; and they identified themselves as such, Filistini (Palestinian), regardless of what British, French, Ottoman, Arab, or Roman administrators chose to call the area. By simply calling them “Arabs�, it conveniently decontextualizes their historical connection to The Land, el-Ard, the one, crucial and central issue! You never hear right-wing Israelis actually call them Palestinians. To do so would recognize their legitimate connection to The Land. So they simply call them the more general and indirect “Arabs�.

Clearly, as Palestinians living within Israel, their predicament is distinct from that of Palestinians in the occupied territories, in refugee camps in Lebanon, or in the exiled global diaspora. We’re always being reminded of how Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East. Is that so? For the Jewish citizens of Israel, it’s a democracy, but not for 20% of its citizens. As a stalling tactic which allows the state of Israel to keep grabbing more land illegally, the Israeli Knesset has to this day never ratified a constitution and has never officially declared its country’s borders. In the meantime, settlements continue to be built and populated, and the defence barrier gets erected deep into Palestinian territory, far outside of Israel proper. There’s a name for this in Political Science: Imperialism. What kind of democracy is that? This would have been like saying apartheid South Africa was the only democracy in Africa. Sure, it was perfectly democratic… for the whites.

In Israel, under the Law of Return and the Nationality Law, a Jewish immigrant can move to Israel from such diverse places as Ethiopia, Poland, the Ukraine, the U.S. or anywhere else and receive full legal rights as a citizen instantly. He or she will automatically have more rights than an indigenous Palestinian. Is this healthy for a society? Is this ethical? Can we really call this democratic?

Israel’s Palestinians are legally barred from owning land, as non-Jews cannot own land in Israel. This affects both Muslim and Christian Palestinians. By the way, 20% of Israel’s Palestinian population is Christian (among the most prominent of them are Arafat’s widow, Suha, Edward Said, and Hanan Ashrawi, all associated with the cause of Palestinian nationalism. Keep that in mind next time you hear an American Evangelist unconditionally defending Israeli policy against the Palestinians. These “Christian Zionists�, as they call themselves, blindly support policies that are harmful to the direct present-day descendants of the early Christian Church. The irony would be hilarious, if it wasn’t so damn tragic and morally repulsive. Christian Palestinians suffer the same fate as their Muslim brothers.

In Israel, many social benefits, such as employment opportunities, better mortgages, partial exemptions from course fees, and preferences for public housing are dependent on your having completed military service. 9o% of Israel’s Palestinian population does not serve in the military, either by law or by discretion. This is an indirect way in which “Israeli Arabs� are discriminated against and economically marginalized. In a democracy, a citizen’s rights are not dependent on his or her having completed compulsory military service. It doesn’t work that way. In a democracy, citizens have rights simply by being born in the society.

Another indirect way Palestinians in Israel are marginalized is through the policy of “unrecognized villages�, another sanitized euphemism, which are Palestinian towns not legally acknowledged by the state as organized municipalities. What this means on the ground is that they get no funding or services whatsoever and are subject to arbitrary demolition or confiscation. Considered non-existent, they don’t appear on official Israeli maps. Palestinian families within Israel are also routinely denied building permits and have their homes demolished or confiscated when they build new ones or add on to them without the permits. Can this be called democratic? It would take quite an unhinged imagination to do so. Whoever repeats the claim that Israel is a democracy, be they journalists, lobbyists, or politicians, is either knowingly perpetuating an agenda which cannot accommodate the facts on the ground or they’re ignorant and haven’t done the research. There is no democracy and there are no “Israeli Arabs�.

The next time you hear “Israeli Arabsâ€?, know that you’re being fed a term which is essentially a political weapon to deny a people their identity and history. It’s racist spin and it’s insulting to your common sense and intelligence. You need only consume Western mainstream media and you’ll hear it soon enough. It’s become legitimate because of its constant repetition by U.S. and Israeli government officials and public relations firms. It’s a tragic irony that the first master propagandist to use this tactic and prove its effectiveness was none other then Joseph Goebbels. Known as the Big Lie, or argumentum ad nauseam, the name given to a policy of repeating a lie until it is taken to be the truth. If you live in the U.S., this should sound familiar to you. So now, in this obese land of shortcuts and convenience, the media smugly and unconsciously perpetuate the terms “Israeli Arabs” and “Israeli democracy”. Sadly, like so many other terms, these have taken on mindless lives of their own. Analysis and accuracy have been sacrificed. We’re participants by our complicit acceptance. This stops when we stop listening. Two reasonable actions you can take right now: 1.) Stop consuming news from mainstream corporate media! 2.) Tell the others! You can’t peddle shitty hack journalism if there is no audience left to consume it.

For anyone who was annoyed like me, i’ll actually document where they are:

the ‘H’ and ‘N’ keys are the left and right apple keys. I’m assume H is left and N is right, but it doesn’t really matter to me.

Also, you can’t map Keypad-H and Keypad-N to the correct spots in one remap session. I guess remapping an embedded key confuses the keyboard. I had to remap one of them, exit remapping mode, and then remap the other (or i’d have an apple key that generated N’s or H’s!)

Eight school board members in Pennsylvania who supported an alternative to Darwin’s theory of evolution lost their seats to evolution supporters.

from bbc (at the very bottom)

Tonight, in boredom, and since i was in the CSS mode from looking at my students HTML homework (we do xhtml 1.0 strict, baby!) i created a much better solution that doesn’t require the ghetto background image smoke and mirrors.

you do the same thing as usual: create two divs and float one to the left of the other.

but on the right div, you actually give it the background you want for the left div
then you give the right div a padding-left equal to the width of the left div

next you put another div inside the right div with the background you really want for the right side

finally, you put one big div around it all with a background the same as the the one for the right side.

that way the padding on the “right” div makes sure the left side has background that spans the whole length of the right div.

and the big div that wraps around it all makes sure the right side has background all the way down if the left side happens to be longer.

check out the code

First off, if that happened within our own borders (i’m writing this from the US) then I would be disappointed with Yahoo! I haven’t taken the time to outline why i would feel this way (maybe its just too darned un-American) because this case didn’t happen in the US. It happened in China.

Yahoo is not in China to push a social agenda. Lets all be clear about that. Its in China because its a huge market in which to make money[2]. Yahoo! has no responsibility to spread democracy in the world. I wouldn’t want some Chinese company coming into the states and trying to suppress speech, and by the same logic, Yahoo! shouldn’t go into China and be uncooperative with the government in the name of a freedom which that government does not allow.

If you want to be a Yahoo! hater because they do business in China in the first place, be my guest. Just don’t get all uppity after the fact cause they follow the rules and regulations over there.

Oh, and the big irony of all this? If the U.S. government went to Yahoo! and said you were a terrorist, Yahoo! would have to hand over your identity too. No need for proof. Thanks to the Patriot Act. I’d like to see a comparison of China’s official policy on privacy compared to post-Patriot Act U.S. I’m sure it would be a close fight to see which is the worst

Funny Foot Notes
[1] Some of the articles refer to the chinese government just as “communists” like its just some random communists running around that Yahoo! worked with. Like it or not its the officially recognized government of China, and they happen to be part of the communist party in China.
[2] there’s a great moral debate to have, instead of this nonsense

Definitely read it:

read on

from Gizmodo

thanks